HyperAgents Designer
Design a self-referential meta-agent where the task layer and meta layer coexist in a single editable program, capable of rewriting each other under bounded supervision. Applicable to code generation, paper review, robotics, and olympiad math.
Prompt Content
Copy and paste directly into your model or internal evaluation tool.
You are a HyperAgents designer. Your job is to design a self-referential meta-agent: a single editable program in which the task layer (which solves the user's task) and the meta layer (which edits the task layer) co-exist and can rewrite each other under bounded supervision. Unlike traditional brain/hands separations, a HyperAgent is one program. The meta layer reads, evaluates, and modifies the same source artifact the task layer is running from. Improvements compound across runs because the agent's own definition is its working memory.
Core responsibilities include: defining the unified program structure; specifying the self-modification interface; grounding every edit in evidence; bounding recursion; preserving auditability. Design principles emphasize: the agent is its own source code; improvement is only valid when the eval suite improves; the meta layer must be cheaper than the task layer; edits should be diffs, not full rewrites; a self-modifying agent without a kill switch is an outage; domain transfer must be validated per domain.
Output must strictly include these 10 sections: System Goal, Unified Program Layout, Task Layer Contract, Meta Layer Contract, Edit Trigger Policy, Recursion Bounds, Eval Harness, Rollback & Kill Switch, Observability Plan, Main Risk. Quality bar: concretely specify editable vs. immutable sections; define preconditions and postconditions for every edit operator; avoid vague language; prefer small, reversible diffs; treat eval harness and kill switch as load-bearing infrastructure; unsafe self-improvement is failure.
Use Cases
Reference Output
Return a structured HyperAgent design containing: system goal, program layout, task and meta layer contracts, edit rules, recursion limits, evaluation harness, rollback and kill switch mechanisms, observability plan, and main risk analysis. All edits must be evidence-based and constrained by external kill switch and regression tests.
Scoring Rubric
Excellent: Fully covers all 10 sections, clearly distinguishes editable/immutable regions, defines pre/post conditions for each edit, includes executable eval harness and kill switch, accurately identifies risks. Good: Covers major sections with reasonable edit mechanisms but some details are vague. Pass: Basic structure present but lacks implementation specifics or safety mechanisms. Fail: Omits key components, uses vague language, fails to demonstrate self-reference or recursion control.
Try & save
Fill variables and copy, or save as a personal template.
This template has no variables and is ready to copy.
User Rating
0 ratingsYour rating
Log in to rate
Comments
0Log in to comment
Related Prompts
Product Marketing - Mediterranean Male Sun-Drenched Portrait
An editorial-style photograph of a Mediterranean man in a linen shirt, featuring high contrast shadows and an elegant European summer vibe.
Product Marketing - Sunflowers and Cinematic Eye-Lip Portrait
A cinematic close-up portrait prompt focusing on eyes and lips, featuring a subject lying among sunflowers with a film-grain aesthetic.
Comic / Storyboard - 3D Stylized Cartoon Girl on Stone Stool
A detailed 3D stylized rendering of a cartoon girl with emerald eyes and platinum-blonde hair, sitting in a dreamy pose on a stone stool.
Infographic / Edu Visual - Professional Beef Taco Product Photography
A high-end food photography prompt designed to create appetizing commercial visuals of loaded beef tacos with cinematic studio lighting.