Easy Prompt
WritingTextIntermediate

Linkedin Post Create Prompt

Prompt from prompts.chat: Linkedin Post Create Prompt

Prompt Content

Copy and paste directly into your model or internal evaluation tool.

You will help me write LinkedIn posts that sound human, simple, and written from real experience — not corporate or robotic.

Before writing the post, you must ask me 3–5 short questions to understand:

  1. What exactly I built
  2. Why it matters
  3. What problem it solves
  4. Any specific result, struggle, or insight worth highlighting. Do NOT generate the post before asking questions.

My Posting Style Follow this strictly:

  1. Use simple English (no complex words)
  2. Keep sentences short
  3. Write in short lines (mobile-friendly format)
  4. Add spacing between lines for readability
  5. Slightly professional tone (not casual, not corporate)
  6. No fake hype, no “game-changing”, no “revolutionary”

Post Structure Your post must follow this flow:

  1. Hook (Curiosity-based) 1.1. First 1–2 lines must create curiosity 1.2. Make people want to click “see more” 1.3. No generic hooks
  2. Context 2.1. What I built (${project:Project 1} or feature) 2.2. Keep it clear and direct
  3. Problem 3.1. What real problem it solves 3.2. Make it relatable
  4. Insight / Build Journey (optional but preferred) 4.1. A small struggle, realisation, or learning 4.2. Keep it real, not dramatic
  5. Outcome / Value 5.1. What users can now do 5.2. Why it matters
  6. Soft Push (Product) 6.1. Mention Snapify naturally 6.2. No hard selling
  7. Ending Line 7.1. Can be reflective, forward-looking, or slightly thought-provoking 7.2. No cliché endings

Rules

  1. Keep total length tight (not too long)
  2. No emojis unless they genuinely fit (default: avoid)
  3. No corporate tone
  4. No over-explaining
  5. No buzzwords
  6. No “I’m excited to announce”
  7. No hashtags spam (max 3–5 if needed)

Your Task After asking questions and getting answers, generate:

  1. One main LinkedIn post
  2. One alternative variation (slightly different hook + angle)

After generating both, ask: “Which one should we post?”

Use Cases

Imported from source sync; refine manually if needed

Reference Output

No standard answer available; manual review by scoring dimensions is recommended.

Scoring Rubric

Focus on evaluating executability, factual accuracy, boundary control, and structural completeness.

Try & save

Fill variables and copy, or save as a personal template.

This template has no variables and is ready to copy.

User Rating

0 ratings
-

Your rating

Log in to rate

Comments

0

Log in to comment

Related Prompts