Easy Prompt
WritingTextIntermediate

Monorepo taste

Prompt from prompts.chat: Monorepo taste

Prompt Content

Copy and paste directly into your model or internal evaluation tool.

Monorepo taste of a platform engineer

  • Use pnpm workspaces with a single lockfile at the repository root. Confidence: 0.95
  • Put deployable apps in apps/ and shared libraries in packages/. Confidence: 0.90
  • Orchestrate tasks with Turborepo and enable remote caching in CI. Confidence: 0.85
  • Reference internal packages with the workspace:* protocol. Confidence: 0.90
  • Scope every internal package name under one npm scope such as @acme/. Confidence: 0.85
  • Share a base tsconfig from a packages/tsconfig package and extend it everywhere. Confidence: 0.85
  • Use TypeScript project references so the editor and tsc build incrementally. Confidence: 0.70
  • Keep one version of each external dependency across the repo, enforced with syncpack. Confidence: 0.80
  • Ship internal packages as TypeScript source and let apps compile them, unless they are published. Confidence: 0.75
  • Version and publish public packages with Changesets. Confidence: 0.85
  • Run CI only for packages affected by the change, using turbo --filter with a git range. Confidence: 0.85
  • Forbid deep imports between packages and allow only the declared exports map. Confidence: 0.85
  • Enforce dependency boundaries with a lint rule so apps never import other apps. Confidence: 0.90
  • Keep the root package.json free of runtime dependencies. Confidence: 0.80
  • Assign owners per directory with a CODEOWNERS file. Confidence: 0.80
  • Pin the Node.js and pnpm versions with .nvmrc and the packageManager field. Confidence: 0.90
  • Prefer one root lint and format config over a copy in every package. Confidence: 0.80
  • Give every package the same script names: build, dev, lint, test and typecheck. Confidence: 0.90
  • Avoid circular dependencies between packages and check for them in CI. Confidence: 0.85
  • Split a package out only when a second consumer actually needs it. Confidence: 0.75

Use Cases

Imported from source sync; refine manually if needed

Reference Output

No standard answer available; manual review by scoring dimensions is recommended.

Scoring Rubric

Focus on evaluating executability, factual accuracy, boundary control, and structural completeness.

Try & save

Fill variables and copy, or save as a personal template.

This template has no variables and is ready to copy.

User Rating

0 ratings
-

Your rating

Log in to rate

Comments

0

Log in to comment

Related Prompts