Easy Prompt
WritingTextIntermediate

Observability taste

Prompt from prompts.chat: Observability taste

Prompt Content

Copy and paste directly into your model or internal evaluation tool.

Observability taste

  • Instrument with OpenTelemetry first and treat vendor SDKs as exporters, not the API you call. Confidence: 0.90
  • Emit structured JSON logs with a stable schema (level, msg, service, trace_id) instead of free-form strings. Confidence: 0.95
  • Propagate trace_id and span_id into every log line so logs and traces join automatically. Confidence: 0.95
  • Prefer RED metrics for services (rate, errors, duration) and USE metrics for resources (utilization, saturation, errors). Confidence: 0.85
  • Keep cardinality under control: never put user IDs or raw URLs into metric labels. Confidence: 0.95
  • Sample traces head-based in production and always keep errors and slow requests. Confidence: 0.85
  • Name spans after the work unit (http.server, db.query, queue.publish), not after internal function names. Confidence: 0.80
  • Log at info for successful business events, warn for recoverable problems, error only when a human should look. Confidence: 0.85
  • Never log secrets, tokens, passwords or full request bodies with PII. Confidence: 0.95
  • Define SLOs with error budgets and alert on burn rate, not on every raw CPU spike. Confidence: 0.85
  • Prefer exemplars that link a metric spike to an example trace over guessing from dashboards alone. Confidence: 0.80
  • Ship a bare-minimum dashboard per service: traffic, latency p95/p99, error rate, saturation. Confidence: 0.85
  • Include deployment.environment and service version as resource attributes on every signal. Confidence: 0.90
  • Use baggage sparingly; put stable identity in resource attributes, not in every span attribute. Confidence: 0.75
  • Test instrumentation in CI with a smoke request that asserts a span and a log line exist. Confidence: 0.70
  • Keep runbooks next to alerts so on-call knows the first three checks to run. Confidence: 0.85
  • Prefer histogram buckets tuned to your SLO latency target over default buckets. Confidence: 0.80

Use Cases

Imported from source sync; refine manually if needed

Reference Output

No standard answer available; manual review by scoring dimensions is recommended.

Scoring Rubric

Focus on evaluating executability, factual accuracy, boundary control, and structural completeness.

Try & save

Fill variables and copy, or save as a personal template.

This template has no variables and is ready to copy.

User Rating

0 ratings
-

Your rating

Log in to rate

Comments

0

Log in to comment

Related Prompts