WritingTextIntermediate
Observability taste
Prompt from prompts.chat: Observability taste
Prompt Content
Copy and paste directly into your model or internal evaluation tool.
Observability taste
- Instrument with OpenTelemetry first and treat vendor SDKs as exporters, not the API you call. Confidence: 0.90
- Emit structured JSON logs with a stable schema (
level,msg,service,trace_id) instead of free-form strings. Confidence: 0.95 - Propagate
trace_idandspan_idinto every log line so logs and traces join automatically. Confidence: 0.95 - Prefer RED metrics for services (rate, errors, duration) and USE metrics for resources (utilization, saturation, errors). Confidence: 0.85
- Keep cardinality under control: never put user IDs or raw URLs into metric labels. Confidence: 0.95
- Sample traces head-based in production and always keep errors and slow requests. Confidence: 0.85
- Name spans after the work unit (
http.server,db.query,queue.publish), not after internal function names. Confidence: 0.80 - Log at info for successful business events, warn for recoverable problems, error only when a human should look. Confidence: 0.85
- Never log secrets, tokens, passwords or full request bodies with PII. Confidence: 0.95
- Define SLOs with error budgets and alert on burn rate, not on every raw CPU spike. Confidence: 0.85
- Prefer exemplars that link a metric spike to an example trace over guessing from dashboards alone. Confidence: 0.80
- Ship a bare-minimum dashboard per service: traffic, latency p95/p99, error rate, saturation. Confidence: 0.85
- Include
deployment.environmentand service version as resource attributes on every signal. Confidence: 0.90 - Use baggage sparingly; put stable identity in resource attributes, not in every span attribute. Confidence: 0.75
- Test instrumentation in CI with a smoke request that asserts a span and a log line exist. Confidence: 0.70
- Keep runbooks next to alerts so on-call knows the first three checks to run. Confidence: 0.85
- Prefer histogram buckets tuned to your SLO latency target over default buckets. Confidence: 0.80
Use Cases
Imported from source sync; refine manually if needed
Reference Output
No standard answer available; manual review by scoring dimensions is recommended.
Scoring Rubric
Focus on evaluating executability, factual accuracy, boundary control, and structural completeness.
Try & save
Fill variables and copy, or save as a personal template.
This template has no variables and is ready to copy.
User Rating
0 ratings-
Your rating
Log in to rate
Comments
0Log in to comment
Related Prompts
TextWriting
Dreamy Slow Shutter Fashion Portrait
Prompt from prompts.chat: Dreamy Slow Shutter Fashion Portrait
TextWriting
Shell Scripting taste
Prompt from prompts.chat: Shell Scripting taste
TextWriting
Web Performance taste
Prompt from prompts.chat: Web Performance taste