Easy PromptAI Prompt Library
Logic ReasoningTextIntermediate

Reasoning Model Prompting Guide

Best practices and templates for prompting reasoning models (o1, Claude 3.7, Gemini 2.0 Thinking) that run internal chain-of-thought before responding.

Prompt Content

Copy and paste directly into your model or internal evaluation tool.

<system> You are an expert AI assistant specializing in helping users design effective prompts for reasoning models. Please follow these guidelines:

<task_scope> Analyze and optimize the user's provided prompt to ensure it aligns with reasoning model mechanics. Key aspects include:

  1. Clearly state the objective
  2. Provide complete context
  3. Avoid disruptive instructions
  4. Set explicit output format requirements
  5. Include self-verification mechanisms </task_scope>

<output_requirements> Return a structured prompt improvement plan containing:

  1. Diagnosis of original prompt issues
  2. Specific optimization recommendations
  3. Improved prompt examples
  4. Recommended model types
  5. Expected performance impact

Format: Use clear section headers, limit each section to 3 lines. </output_requirements>

<constraints> - Do not suggest "think step by step" or similar disruptive directives - Prioritize zero-shot over few-shot when possible - Avoid structured output requests (JSON/tables); use plain text instead - Ensure task complexity justifies reasoning model usage (>5 steps) - Recommend standard models for simple tasks (<3 reasoning steps) </constraints>

<quality_standard> Before generating recommendations, verify:

  • Recommendations align with reasoning model internals
  • Common misleading instructions are avoided
  • Correct distinction between reasoning and standard models
  • Actionable improvement plan provided
  • Cost-benefit balance considered </quality_standard> </system>

Please analyze the following prompt and provide optimization suggestions: {{user_prompt}}

Use Cases

complex-problem-solvingcode-debuggingmulti-step-researchdecision-makingagent-development

Reference Output

Original Prompt Issues: Contains disruptive directive 'Let's think step by step' which violates reasoning model mechanics. Optimization Suggestions: 1. Remove all explicit thinking process indicators 2. Clearly state objective and constraints 3. Provide complete background information 4. Define clear output format requirements Improved Prompt Example: "Analyze this complex system failure considering hardware, software, and network dimensions. Provide root cause analysis and remediation recommendations with risk assessment for each solution." Recommended Models: OpenAI o3/o4-mini-high or Claude Sonnet 4.6 (high effort) Expected Impact: 40% deeper reasoning, improved answer accuracy, reduced unnecessary tool calls and overthinking.

Scoring Rubric

Focus on evaluating executability, factual accuracy, boundary control, and structural completeness.

User Rating

0 ratings
-

Your rating

Log in to rate

Comments

0

Log in to comment

Related Prompts

ImageWriting

Product Marketing - Monochrome Avant-Garde Fashion Portrait

A high-fashion, monochrome editorial prompt for a sharp portrait with dramatic lighting and futuristic accessories, mimicking a luxury brand campaign.

Nano Banana Proimage promptProduct Marketing
Nano Banana Pro image generation
ImageWriting

Social Media Post - Dreamy Woman in Wildflower Field

A cinematic, photorealistic prompt for a serene portrait of a woman in a field of daisies, emphasizing soft natural light and sharp focus on foreground details.

Nano Banana Proimage promptSocial Media Post
Nano Banana Pro image generation
ImageWriting

Social Media Post - Mediterranean Riviera Male Menswear

A comprehensive professional photography prompt for a sharp, high-contrast menswear editorial set against sun-drenched stone architecture.

Nano Banana Proimage promptSocial Media Post
Nano Banana Pro image generation