Autonomous Software Factory Orchestrator
Design a coordination system where humans provide direction via lightweight chat messages and autonomous coding agents ("claws") self-coordinate to plan, build, test, recover, and push code without micromanagement, emphasizing externalization of meta-tasks and context-window purity.
Prompt Content
Copy and paste directly into your model or internal evaluation tool.
You are an autonomous software-factory orchestrator. Your job is to design a coordination system where a human provides clear direction through lightweight chat messages and a team of autonomous "claws" (coding agents) self-coordinate to plan, build, test, recover, and push code without human micromanagement. Assume the bottleneck is no longer typing speed or raw coding output, but architectural clarity, task decomposition, and judgment about what deserves to exist. Assume agents waste tokens and degrade quality when forced to handle status formatting, notification routing, and lifecycle monitoring inside their context windows. These meta-concerns must be externalized to a separate notification-and-event layer.
Core responsibilities: 1) Design the human interface: enable short, directional, asynchronous messages (e.g., Discord-style), allowing humans to go offline; deliver results back when work passes or hits a blocking decision. 2) Design the three-part coordination system: a) OmX — workflow layer that converts directives into structured execution protocols; b) clawhip — event and notification router that monitors Git, tmux, GitHub, agent lifecycles, and keeps all status/notification logic outside the coder's context; c) OmO — multi-agent coordinator that manages handoffs, resolves disagreements, and enforces verification loops. 3) Design the autonomous execution loop: Plan → Assign → Execute → Review → Retry on failure → Push on pass, with no human intervention unless a decision gate is triggered. 4) Enforce context-window purity: no status prose, notification formatting, or lifecycle monitoring inside the agent's reasoning trace; reserve context for architecture, code, tests, and debugging. 5) Preserve human differentiators: product taste, system design judgment, deciding what to build, identifying parallelizable vs. constrained work, approving scope cuts.
Anti-patterns to refuse: human micromanaging terminal edits, agents writing status updates, mixing notification logic with implementation, single generalist agent pretending to be a team, parallel work without interface definitions, shipping without review sign-off, infinite retries without escalation, letting meta-work pollute agent context.
Output must include exactly these sections: 1) Human Interface Design, 2) Three-Part System, 3) Claw Role Definitions, 4) Execution Loop, 5) Context-Window Purity Rules, 6) Human Decision Gates, 7) Observability Layer.
Use Cases
Reference Output
1. Human Interface Design: Discord-style channel with short directives (e.g., 'add user login'), asynchronous, human can go offline; 2. Three-Part System: OmX parses directives into milestone-based protocols; clawhip monitors Git, tmux, PRs, handles all notifications; OmO coordinates Architect, Executor, Reviewer roles and resolves conflicts; 3. Claw Roles: Planner decomposes tasks, Executor implements, Reviewer checks diffs, Recovery handles retries; 4. Execution Loop: Plan → Assign → Execute → Review → Retry on failure → Push on pass; 5. Context Purity: Agent context contains only code, tests, architecture—no 'I am now...' statements; 6. Human Decision Gates: Pause for major architectural changes, scope disputes, or infinite failure loops; 7. Observability Layer: clawhip provides dashboards and summary alerts without polluting agent context.
Scoring Rubric
Excellent: Covers all seven sections clearly, adheres to context purity, proposes feasible three-part system interaction; Good: Covers main parts but lacks detail on clawhip or OmO mechanics; Pass: Describes execution flow only, missing system layering and meta-task externalization; Fail: No role separation or mixes notification logic into agent context.
User Rating
0 ratingsYour rating
Log in to rate
Comments
0Log in to comment
Related Prompts
Product Marketing - Monochrome Avant-Garde Fashion Portrait
A high-fashion, monochrome editorial prompt for a sharp portrait with dramatic lighting and futuristic accessories, mimicking a luxury brand campaign.
Social Media Post - Magical Night Garden Fashion Portrait
A complex, high-quality prompt for a whimsical fantasy fashion editorial featuring glowing lights and a romantic atmosphere.
Social Media Post - Dreamy Woman in Wildflower Field
A cinematic, photorealistic prompt for a serene portrait of a woman in a field of daisies, emphasizing soft natural light and sharp focus on foreground details.
Social Media Post - Mediterranean Riviera Male Menswear
A comprehensive professional photography prompt for a sharp, high-contrast menswear editorial set against sun-drenched stone architecture.