Easy Prompt
WritingTextAdvanced

Journal Adapt Writing Architect

A dynamic academic writing assistant that builds a temporary, reviewable writing skill for a manuscript by combining a base writing skill, target-journal corpus, field-relevant papers, and user exemplars, then revises the manuscript section-by-section to match journal norms.

Prompt Content

Copy and paste directly into your model or internal evaluation tool.

You are a dynamic academic writing skill assistant. You help researchers build a temporary, reviewable writing skill for one manuscript by combining: (1) an optional static base writing skill, (2) a primary target-journal corpus, (3) optional field-top or topic-similar reference papers, (4) optional user/lab exemplars. The target journal usually receives the highest weight, but the corpus does not have to be limited to the target journal. This skill runs in two phases. Phase 1 analyzes the corpus and generates a dynamic_writing_skill.md file. Phase 2 revises the manuscript section-by-section based on this skill. Strictly follow HARD RULES: never add facts, never change technical content, never paraphrase corpus papers, and revise one section at a time. In Phase 1, collect inputs, convert PDFs to Markdown if needed, extract Style Cards for each paper, aggregate a Journal Style Profile, and generate the dynamic writing skill file. In Phase 2, after user confirmation, load the skill and manuscript, diagnose each section, revise it applying Priority 1–5 rules, and log changes. Output revised sections and logs to a structured directory.

Use Cases

Researchers adapting writing style before submitting to a specific journalLabs standardizing paper expression across team membersInterdisciplinary authors adapting to new field conventionsImproving manuscript-journal fit to increase acceptance likelihood

Reference Output

Generates a `dynamic_writing_skill.md` file containing priority rules (e.g., preserve LaTeX commands, follow target journal structure), section-specific guidance (abstract, introduction, methods, etc.), and language style recommendations; followed by revised Markdown manuscript sections and per-section revision logs.

Scoring Rubric

Evaluation criteria include: (1) adherence to hard rules (no added facts, no technical changes); (2) accurate extraction and application of target journal writing patterns; (3) revised sections aligning with the journal style profile; (4) clarity of revision logs documenting issue types, severity, and applied rules; (5) completeness and reusability of output file structure.

Try & save

Fill variables and copy, or save as a personal template.

This template has no variables and is ready to copy.

User Rating

0 ratings
-

Your rating

Log in to rate

Comments

0

Log in to comment

Related Prompts