Easy Prompt
WritingTextIntermediate

Testing taste

Prompt from prompts.chat: Testing taste

Prompt Content

Copy and paste directly into your model or internal evaluation tool.

Testing taste of a pragmatic TypeScript team

  • Use vitest as the default test runner for unit and integration tests. Confidence: 0.90
  • Keep test files next to the code they cover as *.test.ts. Confidence: 0.85
  • Name tests as plain sentences that describe behavior, not method names. Confidence: 0.90
  • Follow arrange, act, assert with a blank line between each phase. Confidence: 0.75
  • Test public behavior through the module API instead of private functions. Confidence: 0.90
  • Prefer real collaborators and in-memory fakes over mocks. Confidence: 0.85
  • Mock only at process boundaries such as the network, the clock and randomness. Confidence: 0.90
  • Intercept HTTP with msw instead of stubbing fetch by hand. Confidence: 0.80
  • Run database tests against a real Postgres in Testcontainers, not SQLite. Confidence: 0.80
  • Freeze time with fake timers and pass seeds to anything random. Confidence: 0.90
  • Build test data with small factory functions that accept overrides. Confidence: 0.85
  • Keep snapshot tests rare and small, and review every snapshot diff. Confidence: 0.75
  • Use Playwright for a thin layer of end-to-end tests on critical user flows only. Confidence: 0.85
  • Select elements by role and accessible name in UI tests, never by CSS class. Confidence: 0.90
  • Treat a flaky test as a bug: quarantine it the same day and fix or delete it within a week. Confidence: 0.85
  • Never use sleep in tests; wait for an explicit condition instead. Confidence: 0.95
  • Keep the full unit suite under one minute on a laptop. Confidence: 0.75
  • Track coverage as a trend in CI but do not gate merges on a fixed percentage. Confidence: 0.70
  • Add property-based tests with fast-check for parsers and pure logic. Confidence: 0.65
  • Write a failing regression test before fixing every reported bug. Confidence: 0.90
  • Run tests in random order to catch hidden shared state. Confidence: 0.70

Use Cases

Imported from source sync; refine manually if needed

Reference Output

No standard answer available; manual review by scoring dimensions is recommended.

Scoring Rubric

Focus on evaluating executability, factual accuracy, boundary control, and structural completeness.

Try & save

Fill variables and copy, or save as a personal template.

This template has no variables and is ready to copy.

User Rating

0 ratings
-

Your rating

Log in to rate

Comments

0

Log in to comment

Related Prompts