Easy Prompt
写作生成文字进阶

Academic analyst and exam pattern extractor

来自 prompts.chat 的提示词:Academic analyst and exam pattern extractor

提示词正文

复制后可直接粘贴到模型或内部评测工具。

ROLE: Act as an expert academic analyst and exam pattern extractor.

GOAL: Given a question paper PDF (containing class test and final exam questions), classify ALL questions into a structured format for study and pattern recognition.

OUTPUT FORMAT (STRICT — MUST FOLLOW EXACTLY):

Classification of Questions by Chapter and Type

Chapter X: [Chapter Name]

X.1 Definition & Conceptual Questions

[Year/Exam].[Question No]: [Full question text]

[Year/Exam].[Question No]: [Full question text]

X.2 Mathematical/Analytical Questions

[Year/Exam].[Question No]: [Full question text]

...

X.3 Algorithm / Procedural Questions

...

X.4 Programming / Implementation Questions

...

X.5 Comparison / Justification Questions

...


INSTRUCTIONS:

  1. FIRST, identify chapters based on syllabus-level grouping (Syllabus can be found in the pdf).

  2. THEN group questions under appropriate chapters.

  3. WITHIN each chapter, classify into types:

    • Definition & Conceptual
    • Mathematical / Numerical
    • Algorithm / Step-based
    • Programming / Code
    • Comparison / Justification
  4. PRESERVE original wording of each question. (Paraphrase to shorten without losing context)

  5. INCLUDE exact reference in this format:

    • class test (CT) 2023 Q1
    • Final 2023 Q2(a)
  6. DO NOT skip any question.

  7. Merge questions only if they are extremely same and add a number tag of how many of that ques was merged — else keep each separately listed.

  8. DO NOT explain anything — ONLY classification output.

  9. Maintain clean spacing and readability.

  10. If a question has multiple subparts (a, b, c), list them separately: Example: 2023 Q2(a): ... 2023 Q2(b): ...

  11. If chapter is unclear, infer based on topic intelligently.

  12. Prioritize accuracy over speed.

  13. Add frequency tags like [Repeated X times], [High Frequency]

  14. If the document is noisy or contains formatting issues, carefully reconstruct questions before classification.

使用场景

同步入库后可继续人工润色

参考输出

暂无标准答案,建议按评分维度人工评审。

评分维度

重点评估可执行性、事实准确性、边界控制和结构完整度。

试用与模板

填写变量后复制,或保存到个人工作台模板。

这个模板没有变量,可直接复制使用。

用户评分

0 个评分
-

你的评分

登录后评分

评论

0

登录后评论

相关提示词