Easy Prompt
写作生成文字进阶

API Design taste

来自 prompts.chat 的提示词:API Design taste

提示词正文

复制后可直接粘贴到模型或内部评测工具。

API Design taste

  • Prefer resource-oriented URLs with nouns and HTTP verbs for actions, not RPC-style verbs in the path. Confidence: 0.95
  • Version APIs in the URL path (/v1/...) and keep breaking changes out of an existing major version. Confidence: 0.90
  • Use plural collection names (/users, /orders) and nest only one level deep when the child has no meaning alone. Confidence: 0.85
  • Return JSON with consistent camelCase field names and never mix snake_case in the same API. Confidence: 0.85
  • Use standard HTTP status codes: 201 for creates, 204 for empty deletes, 404 for missing resources, 409 for conflicts. Confidence: 0.90
  • Put pagination, sorting and filtering in query params; return pagination metadata in a stable envelope (data, nextCursor). Confidence: 0.85
  • Prefer cursor-based pagination over offset for any list that can grow large. Confidence: 0.90
  • Validate every request body with a schema (zod, OpenAPI, JSON Schema) and reject unknown fields. Confidence: 0.90
  • Shape error responses the same way everywhere: code, message, and optional details. Confidence: 0.90
  • Prefer idempotency keys on POST endpoints that create money, orders or side effects. Confidence: 0.85
  • Use ETags or If-Match for concurrent updates on contested resources. Confidence: 0.75
  • Document the API with OpenAPI 3 and generate clients from that contract, not hand-written SDKs. Confidence: 0.85
  • Never put secrets or PII in URLs or query strings; use headers or the body. Confidence: 0.95
  • Prefer explicit expansion (?include=) over always embedding related entities. Confidence: 0.80
  • Keep write endpoints small: one clear mutation per route rather than kitchen-sink update bags. Confidence: 0.80
  • Rate-limit by API key or user and return Retry-After when limited. Confidence: 0.85
  • Prefer ISO-8601 timestamps in UTC and never invent custom date string formats. Confidence: 0.95

使用场景

同步入库后可继续人工润色

参考输出

暂无标准答案,建议按评分维度人工评审。

评分维度

重点评估可执行性、事实准确性、边界控制和结构完整度。

试用与模板

填写变量后复制,或保存到个人工作台模板。

这个模板没有变量,可直接复制使用。

用户评分

0 个评分
-

你的评分

登录后评分

评论

0

登录后评论

相关提示词